The Folk Hour on WHCL-FM
One Hamilton institution (albeit, a young one) that welcomed Kirkland women in 1968 was the broadcast station WHCL-FM (“88.7 on your FM dial”). Its studio was then located in the basement of Minor Theater, and it boasted an AP Newswire teletype (student staffers were expected to check for breaking news and to share any important reports).
The history of WHCL-FM is told (in brief) on its current website. In the late ’60s, the station was governed by a somewhat formal structure, which included a Program Director, show producers and on-air hosts. Per FCC (music licensing) regulations, all programs had to submit a playlist in advance of broadcast.
While I can’t recall all the details of how we got started, I know that show producer Merrill Jones (who passed away in 1979) took me on as an announcer. Together we worked on a playlist of contemporary folk (pre folk-rock) offerings and commentary. Within a year, I was producing live music broadcasts in cooperation with the Kirkland Coffee House (housed in a corner of McEwen, near the rock swing).
On November 6, 1969, 9:45pm-12mid, we broadcast “Grassroots” live Broadcast from the Kirkland Coffee House. Bob Shea was our engineer, and I kept a 1/4″ reel-to-reel magnetic tape from the program for 35 years. In 2005 I was able to digitize some selections.
This first selection is the most interesting to me, and may deserve some explanation.
Maggie Calt (K’72) guitar solo:
Maggie Calt is a niece of B.F. Skinner, one of Hamilton’s more renowned graduates. In the ’60s, her brother Steven started a roots music record label, well-regarded in its day, called Yazoo. Before entering Kirkland, Maggie met and learned from some Delta Blues greats (like Skip James and Bukka White) who were old men when Yazoo revived interest in them. So she brought a guitar style to Kirkland that was not informed (as mine was) by Peter, Paul and Mary . She introduced me to Robert Johnson, before his work became well-known through Rolling Stone covers.
Maggie was also a French scholar – I recall she did a paper on Robert Johnson and Existentialism – and left campus for France before our senior year. She later married a French citizen and lived in Africa, when he was stationed in Senegal, in the late ’70s. Based upon what I found via Google, Maggie still lives in France, working as a freelance translator.
The ’69 broadcast ended with a live (and somewhat over-extended) blues jam, with both Kirkland and Hamilton guitarists going at it to the best of their varying abilities!
H/K Guitar Jam (includes Maggie Calt K’72, Jennie Morris ’72, Richard Marcus H’72, John Mark Garrison H’072, Greg Ritz H’70, Jim Paisley, S. Bennett, and J. Bilser)
The third folk music audio is of me and a couple of friends – somewhat loosened up, but having fun – perhaps representative of how we entertained ourselves back in the day!
Kirkland Folkies in ’71: Jennie Morris, Sue Shyan Delahanty, Pat McLaughlin Amidon (all K’72)
by Jennie Morris K’72
While writing a philosophy of education statement for work recently, I found myself facing lots of pronoun/antecedent issues.
Here’s what I mean: I’d write a sentence like, “Even if a child doesn’t like their [his] teacher, they [he] like[s] the experience of feeling safe and valued.”
The problem is that the sentence is grammatically incorrect because the antecedent – child – is singular. The pronoun should be singular, but our third-person singular pronouns are gender specific (he, she, his, her, etc.). That reminded me of the Kirkland College catalogue, and why words matter. The singular pronoun was always feminine.
“Every student should meet with her advisor to discuss her concentration requirements.”
I’d never read anything that used the singular pronoun that way. It had a subtle but powerful effect. That sentence, this catalogue – they were written for me! It made me think of the pervasive but somewhat ignored male dominance in my life. In every other context, that sentence would have read, “Every student should meet with his advisor to discuss his concentration requirements.” I would have understood that the pronoun he included me, but it included me as an afterthought, sort of like “Oh yeah, girls can play, too.”
At Kirkland, though, I wasn’t an afterthought. I was the targeted audience.
The sense of importance this kind of thoughtful writing gave me was underscored by an experience I had in one of my Hamilton classes. I was taking Restoration Comedy with Fred Wagner (a wonderful person, by the way). We had taken one of those blue book tests; we’d had to write several essays. Before handing back the tests, Dr. Wagner said something like, “I want to read some of your classmates’ work to you, so you’ll know what a good essay is.” He didn’t tell us who had written the essays, but mine was one of them. When he finished reading each one, he’d ask the class, “Now what do you think is good about this essay?”
The only specific observation I remember is that someone thought it was thorough. What I remember most sharply is that there were several comments and each one referred to the anonymous writer (me) as he or him. It was sort of surreal to listen to people talk about me and my writing and refer to me as a man. There were three women in that class of 20, so maybe it makes sense that students would use the male pronoun. I still think that someone a little more observant might have said “he or she.”
As I look back, I’m keenly aware of the juxtaposition of my feelings. While Dr. Wagner’s choice of my essay made me feel good, my invisibility to my classmates made me feel . . . invisible.
I don’t include the anecdote about the English class to throw criticism at the other students. It’s just that women don’t often get the chance to feel so strikingly what the pervasive use of the masculine pronoun can do – make women somewhat invisible.
Every piece of writing the Kirkland institution produced — course catalogs, admissions and alumnae publications, flyers — used the feminine pronoun. As if I’d had a dose of vitamin D on a string of sunny days, I felt more immune to self-esteem issues in a world that didn’t always value women. Kirkland taught me that women — and words — matter.
Jan Sidebotham, K’79
A View from Across the Road
When Kirkland greeted its first students in 1968, few of those studying across the road suddenly thought of their school as a “coordinate college.” Very few, in fact, knew what to expect.
In 2009 Shelley Cowan K’75 had an opportunity to ask Hamilton’s Professor Jay Williams about his perspective on the Kirkland decade. Professor Williams was Chaplain and Professor of Religion during that time, and many Kirkland students enrolled in his classes. Click the triangle below to listen:
Not long after this was recorded, the H/K classes of 1975 held a joint reunion on the Hill. Peter Lotto contributed this summary of their recollections:
As part of our 2010 reunion celebration, Hamilton and Kirkland graduates from ‘75 gathered in Café Opus for an open-mic dialog about what it was like to have been part of “the middle years” of Kirkland-Hamilton. While Kirkland alumnae have had a number of opportunities to talk about their experiences, Hamilton alumni have not had many public discussions about the impact of Kirkland on their college years. We didn’t record the conversation; so if you were there, please correct my quotes and add whatever I missed. [Click here to read more]











